What Is Humanist Hypnosis?
Humanist Hypnosis is an approach where you remain fully conscious — and where you do the work yourself. Where classical hypnosis takes you "inward," this one does the opposite: it expands your consciousness, and you become the agent of change while the practitioner guides you. You see everything, you understand everything, you remember everything.
This is the approach that particularly suits people who dislike the idea of "letting go of control." To understand the hypnotic state in general, see our guide on solutionshypnose.com.
Humanist Hypnosis: Origin and Principles
Where it comes from
Humanist Hypnosis is a recent, French-language approach, formalized in the 2000s by Olivier Lockert and Patricia d'Angeli, practitioners and trainers themselves coming from Ericksonian hypnosis. Their starting point was a simple question: what if we reversed the movement? Until then, every form of hypnosis rested on dissociation: you "go down" into an inner state, the critical mind is set aside, and the practitioner works with the unconscious.
Humanist Hypnosis proposes the opposite path: expanding consciousness rather than narrowing it, and making the person fully the agent of their own work. Hence its name: "humanist," in the sense that it places the person — conscious, responsible, at the controls — at the center of the process.
The principle that sets it apart: expanded consciousness
Here is the central idea, and it's worth grasping well. In classical or Ericksonian hypnosis, the induction progressively narrows the field of attention: distractions fade, attention focuses inward, and a state of dissociation sets in. The practitioner then addresses a part of you that works without you needing to follow it consciously.
In Humanist Hypnosis, the induction does the opposite: it opens. The practitioner guides you to expand your perception — of yourself, of space, of what surrounds you — up to a state the approach calls "expanded consciousness." You lose nothing: you are more present, not less.
And above all: you are the one acting. The practitioner doesn't suggest a change on your behalf; they guide you while you bring it about. Many people describe the difference this way: in classical hypnosis, you let it happen; in Humanist Hypnosis, you make it happen.
How Does Humanist Hypnosis "Work"?
Symbolic work, explained simply
This is the tool most characteristic of the approach, and it deserves to be demystified. In this state of expanded consciousness, the practitioner invites you to let your difficulty take on a symbolic form: an image, an object, a landscape, a sensation. Someone carrying an overwhelming burden might "see" a sack of stones. An old fear might appear as a wall, a knot, a closed door… You then work on that form: you transform it, you lighten it, you open the door — at your own pace and in your own way.
An important clarification, to avoid any misunderstanding: there is nothing mystical about this. The symbol isn't a message from elsewhere: it's simply a natural language of the human mind, the very same one that produces our dreams and our everyday metaphors. When we say "I have a weight on my shoulders" or "I'm in a fog," we're already speaking in symbols. Humanist hypnosis uses this language because it lets you work on a difficulty without having to put everything into words, and because the mind often accepts moving an image more readily than arguing against an emotion.
What actually happens in a session
The way it unfolds often surprises those expecting movie-style hypnosis. You sit, sometimes with your eyes open. The practitioner guides you through speech, you respond, you describe what you perceive. The exchange is continuous: it isn't a monologue you undergo, it's a dialogue during which you remain fully present.
You generally remember the entire session. This is a notable difference from some experiences of classical hypnosis, where memory can be hazy. And you know at every moment what you are doing, since you are the one doing it.
This active participation is also the approach's main requirement: it calls for involvement. Someone who is exhausted, and simply wants to let themselves be carried along for a session, will often be more comfortable with an Ericksonian approach, at least to start.
Humanist or Ericksonian: which to choose?
They aren't opposed to each other — they complement one another, and many of our practitioners are trained in both, choosing according to the person and the moment.
Humanist Hypnosis will likely suit you if you need to stay in control, if the idea of "letting go" makes you uneasy, if you want to understand what's happening and participate actively, or if you prefer working with images rather than explanations.
The Ericksonian approach will be better suited if you want to be guided effortlessly, if you're tired to the point that participating would be one more strain, or if you have trouble visualizing (see Ericksonian Hypnosis). In practice, the first conversation is precisely there to help choose. And nothing stops you from switching approaches partway through if one turns out to suit you better than the other.
The Benefits of Humanist Hypnosis
Wonderful imaginary journeys (and therapeutic ones)
If you're very imaginative, if you enjoy the world of symbols, if you move easily from one mental image to another… all while talking with your practitioner… you will most likely love humanist hypnosis. Creating your Ideal Self, talking with your Inner Critic or your Inner Sage, going through a symbolic "molt" to create a new life…
Humanist hypnosis often goes beyond changing behaviors or managing stress to take you toward introspection and powerful conversations with yourself, to help you "create the life you want."
What the science says
We won't make an exception to our rule of honesty, even when it doesn't favor an approach we practice. Humanist Hypnosis has not been the subject of any specific scientific study. It's a recent approach, essentially French-language, and no one has rigorously compared its results to those of other forms of hypnosis. Anyone claiming it is "scientifically superior" would be asserting something that doesn't exist.
What is documented is hypnosis in general: its existence as a state, measurable through brain imaging, and its effectiveness in several areas, of which pain is the best established (see our guide on solutionshypnose.com). Humanist Hypnosis rests on that shared foundation: focused attention, mental imagery, the supportive relationship.
What can reasonably be said: it suits certain profiles very well, particularly those put off by dissociation. And being an agent rather than a spectator is experienced by many as more comfortable and empowering. That's an argument from experience, not proof of superior effectiveness. We'd rather put it to you that way.
An approach born in France
An interesting detail: Humanist Hypnosis is a French creation, formalized in the early 2000s, and it spread first within the French-speaking world. That's why you'll hear about it here far more than elsewhere, and also why the available literature is almost exclusively in French.
A word about training
The title of hypnotherapist isn't regulated in France. Humanist hypnosis is taught in specific programs certified by the IFHE, the school founded by Olivier Lockert and Patricia d'Angeli. This is distinct from Ericksonian hypnosis training.
Our practitioners list their school, the length of their training, and their certifications on their profile : it's the kind of check we encourage you to make, here as anywhere else.
What humanist hypnosis can help with
Stress & Anxiety
Emotional Regulation
Self-Confidence
Habits & Behavior
Health & Quality of Life
Performance
Relationships
Hypno-Coaching
Frequently asked questions about humanist hypnosis
Yes, that's the very principle of the approach. The induction expands your consciousness instead of narrowing it: you are more present, not less. You dialogue with the practitioner throughout the session, you know at every moment what you're doing, and you remember it fully afterward.
The movement is reversed. Ericksonian hypnosis takes you inward, into a dissociated state where a part of you works while you let yourself be guided. Humanist hypnosis opens up consciousness and makes you the agent: you are the one bringing about the change, the practitioner guides you. Neither is superior to the other; they suit different people and different moments.
No, and this is important to clarify. The symbol is a natural language of the mind, the same one that produces our dreams and our everyday expressions: "a weight on my shoulders," "being in a fog." The approach uses it because it allows you to work on a difficulty without putting everything into words, and because it's often easier to move an image than to argue against an emotion. There is nothing mystical in it.
That's common, and it isn't a dealbreaker: symbolic work also happens through sensations, impressions, and words, since not everyone "sees" images. The practitioner adapts to how you perceive things. That said, if visualization is genuinely difficult for you, the Ericksonian approach will often be more comfortable, and we can discuss that.
No, and we'd rather say so clearly: no specific study validates it, since it's a recent, essentially French-language approach. What is documented is hypnosis in general: its existence as a state and its effectiveness in several areas. Humanist Hypnosis rests on that shared foundation; what's specific to it comes from clinical experience, not from demonstrated proof.
No, it calls for active participation, so a certain mental availability. Someone very exhausted, who mainly needs to be carried along, will often be more comfortable with Ericksonian hypnosis, at least to start. And in certain contexts of significant fragility, neither of these approaches should come first: what's needed is a doctor or a psychologist.
Well-being hypnotherapy is complementary support: it does not treat illness and does not replace medical or psychological advice, treatment, or care.
Page written by Christian Rocher
hypnotherapist and NLP coach
partner at Solutions Hypnose.
Published .